The primary theme in a lot of negative comments about writing courses is that they don't always produce good writers. To me, that kind of goes without saying really. A physics course won't always produce good physicists. And from what I've seen, I'm not sure Royle's comment about creative writing taking over from the study of literature is quite right. The two remain separate disciplines. Hence why I've studied/am studying both separately.
In any case, I've always maintained that it takes 2 things to be a writer: technical ability and something to say. Perhaps inevitably, more people have one or the other than have both...
"Perhaps inevitably, more people have one or the other than have both. That's not the fault of writing courses. That's always been the case. In published work as well as non-published."
I agree with Neil. A good writer needs, firstly, to have something to say, and secondly, the technical ability to express clearly and eloquently. I'd like to add a third element (or a sub-element of technical ability), and that is to be able to stimulate and move the reader in some form or fashion. No one wants to read something that does not incite some sort of reaction, whether it is sadness or happiness. Creative writing should have an emotional element to it, whether it is of humor, happiness, anger or sadness.
Good points guys, and thanks especially for that link. I agree with Ruth (from Neil's link) about the experience thing, but that's about it! It's easy to take cheap shots at writing courses and some of the folks they produce and both these articles have plenty of 'chip on the shoulder' about them. Anyways, thanks for stopping by and commenting guys, good to hear your views and even better to have the privilege of agreeing with you.
I'm a writer and this is my blog. Author of Till Roll (2018), published by Sam Riviere's If a Leaf Falls Press. I've appeared in Edge Hill University's Question Mark, Peter Barlow's Cigarette's Sampler #28, and Robert Sheppard's Pages. I've also had the pleasure of reading out at a number of events across the north of England.
I'm currently working in a pub, but I'm looking for a job that utilises my skills[communication, proof reading, editing, creativity, content writing, proof reading, editing, creative collaboration etc] and inspires me. Hope you enjoy your stay and please feel free to comment.
WARNING: MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF MISINFORMATION
Thirsty for more? Then check out the other blog I contribute to: www.allhailtheale.com
Interesting article. Reminded me of this:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/ruth-fowler/orange-prize-_b_874173.html
The primary theme in a lot of negative comments about writing courses is that they don't always produce good writers. To me, that kind of goes without saying really. A physics course won't always produce good physicists. And from what I've seen, I'm not sure Royle's comment about creative writing taking over from the study of literature is quite right. The two remain separate disciplines. Hence why I've studied/am studying both separately.
In any case, I've always maintained that it takes 2 things to be a writer: technical ability and something to say. Perhaps inevitably, more people have one or the other than have both...
Damn, cut off a bit of my text. What I meant was:
Delete"Perhaps inevitably, more people have one or the other than have both. That's not the fault of writing courses. That's always been the case. In published work as well as non-published."
I agree with Neil. A good writer needs, firstly, to have something to say, and secondly, the technical ability to express clearly and eloquently. I'd like to add a third element (or a sub-element of technical ability), and that is to be able to stimulate and move the reader in some form or fashion. No one wants to read something that does not incite some sort of reaction, whether it is sadness or happiness. Creative writing should have an emotional element to it, whether it is of humor, happiness, anger or sadness.
DeleteGood points guys, and thanks especially for that link. I agree with Ruth (from Neil's link) about the experience thing, but that's about it!
DeleteIt's easy to take cheap shots at writing courses and some of the folks they produce and both these articles have plenty of 'chip on the shoulder' about them.
Anyways, thanks for stopping by and commenting guys, good to hear your views and even better to have the privilege of agreeing with you.
Thanks for a great article .
ReplyDeleteThanks for checking it out :)
DeleteNice article, Discussed on wonderful topic.
ReplyDelete